5th December 2006NSW Farmers’ Association is demanding WorkCover pay the legal costs of a Canowindra farmer who was forced to spend $300,000 in defending a court action against him which has now been withdrawn.![]()
Association president, Jock Laurie, said the blunder by WorkCover must be rectified immediately and the farmer should not be forced to wear the costly mistake.![]()
“This is an outrageous abuse of power by WorkCover bureaucrats in attacking an innocent farmer,” Mr Laurie said.![]()
“Workcover was forced to withdraw the allegation through a lack of evidence and now refuses to pay for its mistake.”![]()
The farmer had been charged for using an unsafe ‘as new’ piece of equipment – a 2388 International Harvester. ![]()
The association sais WorkCover maintained the farmer should have made numerous technical modifications – despite the fact the machine had been made by the world’s biggest manufacturer, Case New Holland, and cost more than $350,000.![]()
After evidence was presented to the court that this was not possible, WorkCover had to withdraw that part of the case. A loophole in the Criminal Procedure Act 2006 prevented the presiding judge from awarding costs.![]()
Mr Laurie said the case has significantly damaged WorkCover’s standing and reputation in the rural community who cannot afford to fight unjust legal action.